ArticleGlobal medical genetics2026
Exploring EPHB4 in gait disorders: VUS detection and phenotypic characterization in a toe-walking cohort.
Article in Global medical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is a gait abnormality with a suspected genetic contribution, although its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. While ephrin type-B receptor 4 (EPHB4) is primarily recognized for its role in vascular development, this study explored whether EPHB4 variants identified in children with ITW were associated with specific clinical characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and genetic data of 20 children with toe walking who harbored EPHB4 variants identified using a targeted 49-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Results: Genetic analysis identified 18 distinct EPHB4 variants, all of which were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) according to the five-tier sequence variant classification system. The most common clinical findings were pes cavus (40%), clinodactyly/brachydactyly (40%), and speech or language delay (40%). Notably, only 10% of patients exhibited the venous anomalies typically associated with pathogenic EPHB4 variants. Conclusions: This study identified a recurrent occurrence of EPHB4 variants in children with idiopathic toe walking. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because all identified variants were classified as VUS, no clear genotype-phenotype correlation was observed, and ascertainment bias cannot be excluded. Further functional studies and familial segregation analyses are required to determine whether these findings represent a true biological association or incidental observations. These results highlight the complexity of investigating potential genetic contributors to common pediatric gait disorders such as idiopathic toe walking. Clinical trial registration: not applicable.Retrospective cohort analysis of existing clinical data. Not prospectively registered as no interventions were performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.