Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859519›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Biomarkers and Risk Prediction in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.

Yuanyuan Lu, Mingxin Yang, Jinbo Yu, Pan Lin, Jun Ji, Xiaoqiang Ding, Yaqiong Wang, Xialian Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanyuan LuDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2566-831X
Mingxin YangDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Jinbo YuDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Pan LinDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Jun JiDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqiang DingDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Yaqiong WangDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.
Xialian XuDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032 Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a complex interplay among cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and metabolic disorders; meanwhile, CKM syndrome affects a significant proportion of adults and increases the risk of heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and premature death. This review examines traditional and emerging biomarkers in CKM syndrome, focusing on the clinical utility and predictive value of these markers for disease progression and outcomes. Traditional markers include cardiovascular, renal, metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers. Meanwhile, emerging biomarkers include novel lipid biomarkers, epigenetic and microRNA markers, and metabolic and inflammatory markers. Composite tools integrating traditional and emerging biomarkers have shown promise for improving risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Moreover, the Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) Events (PREVENT) and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic 2-Stage 2-Biomarker Assessment Group (CKM

Indexed as

biomarkerscardiovascular–kidney–metabolic syndromemachine learningrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42859519
PMCPMC13653173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.