Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859505›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2026

Suspected Mesenteric Malperfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Reperfusion-First Strategies.

Tam Le, Steven Chok, Khuram Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tam LeDepartment of Anesthesia HCA Florida Northwest Hospital Margate Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-4477
Steven ChokNova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine Davie Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9853-4229
Khuram KhanDepartment of Anesthesia HCA Florida Northwest Hospital Margate Florida USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection during pregnancy is rare but potentially catastrophic. Acute Type A aortic dissection generally requires urgent surgical repair. When visceral malperfusion is present, however, the optimal sequence of interventions may be complex, particularly when pregnancy and recent cesarean delivery increase operative risk. Endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed aortic repair has been proposed in selected patients, although evidence supporting this strategy in pregnancy remains limited. A 37-year-old woman at 31 weeks' gestation presented with chest and back pain. Initial CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed for suspected pulmonary embolism excluded pulmonary embolism but demonstrated marked aortic root dilatation measuring 6.7 × 5.4 cm. Before definitive aortic imaging could be obtained, she developed acute respiratory deterioration and fetal distress, prompting emergency cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Postoperatively, transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe aortic root and ascending aortic dilatation, severe aortic regurgitation, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and a dissection flap consistent with Type A aortic dissection. Because of concern for catastrophic hemorrhage associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest shortly after cesarean delivery, definitive aortic repair was deferred for approximately 24 h while the patient underwent medical optimization. During this interval, she developed progressive metabolic acidosis and worsening renal function, raising clinical concern for visceral malperfusion. Dedicated abdominal vascular imaging was not obtained, and therefore the presence, distribution, and mechanism of mesenteric malperfusion could not be anatomically confirmed before surgery. At subsequent operative exploration, extensive small- and large-bowel necrosis and markedly hypoperfused adnexal tissue were identified, precluding definitive aortic repair. The patient subsequently died after transition to comfort-focused care. In an analysis from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, mesenteric malperfusion was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than dissection without malperfusion. This case highlights the diagnostic and management challenges of acute Type A aortic dissection during pregnancy. In a pregnant patient presenting with chest or back pain and marked aortic root dilatation on PE-protocol imaging, acute aortic syndrome should prompt urgent evaluation of the entire aorta. Progressive metabolic acidosis, renal dysfunction, or unexplained clinical deterioration should raise concern for visceral ischemia. Although reperfusion-first strategies have been described in selected patients with aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion, their applicability in pregnancy remains uncertain and depends on defined vascular anatomy and the mechanism of malperfusion.

Indexed as

aortic dissectioncardiovascular surgical procedurescase reportscesarean sectionmesenteric ischemiapregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID42859505
PMCPMC13653136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.