Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859492›Full record

ReviewStroke research and treatment2026

Nanoparticles in the Diagnosis and Management of Stroke: A Review.

Muhammad Furqan, Muhammad Qasim Qureshi, F N U Huda, Hiba Azhar, Shaheera Younus, Saad Sohail, Saba Sattar, Sadia Binte Rahim, Muhammad Usman Haider, Mazhar Khalid and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad FurqanDepartment of Medicine King Edward Medical University Lahore Punjab Pakistan kemu.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8459-5880
Muhammad Qasim QureshiDepartment of Neurology King Edward Medical University Lahore Punjab Pakistan kemu.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7157-9230
F N U HudaDepartment of Medicine University Medical and Dental College Faisalabad Punjab Pakistan duhs.edu.pk.
Hiba AzharDepartment of Anesthesiology Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi Sindh Pakistan jsmu.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3166-163X
Shaheera YounusDepartment of General Surgery Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi Sindh Pakistan jsmu.edu.pk.
Saad SohailDepartment of Medicine King Edward Medical University Lahore Punjab Pakistan kemu.edu.pk.
Saba SattarDepartment of Neurology King Edward Medical University Lahore Punjab Pakistan kemu.edu.pk.
Sadia Binte RahimDepartment of Medicine Mymensingh Medical College Hospital Mymensingh Mymensingh Division Bangladesh mmc.gov.bd.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3792-6403
Muhammad Usman HaiderDepartment of Internal Medicine Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA.
Mazhar KhalidDepartment of Neurology Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA stonybrook.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-5924
Bilal ButtDepartment of Neurology University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA umd.edu.
Tejas PhirkeData Analytics Program School of Engineering and Applied Science George Washington University Washington DC USA gwu.edu.
Peter KamelDepartment of Neuroradiology Division of Diagnostic Imaging The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA uth.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the fourth leading cause of disability-adjusted life years worldwide, yet disease-modifying treatment remains largely confined to reperfusion of large-vessel ischemic occlusion within a narrow window. No neuroprotective or hemostatic agent has entered routine practice. Engineered nanoparticles have been proposed to improve delivery across the blood-brain barrier, concentrate drug within the ischemic or perihematomal microenvironment, and add imaging or sensing functions. The resulting literature is large but fragmented across platforms, models, and outcome measures, so it is not evident which platforms carry the strongest evidence or which are closest to clinical evaluation. This narrative review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence on nanoparticle-based diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and monitoring in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2025 using predefined Boolean strings and assigned each included study an evidence tier to separate extrapolated and cross-field evidence from stroke-specific data. Comparative tables summarize nanoparticle type, payload, model, route, dose, treatment window, particle size and surface charge, principal outcomes, safety assessment, and translational readiness. Therapeutic evidence is almost entirely preclinical: Efficacy has been shown in young, male, comorbidity-free rodents treated within minutes of reperfusion and followed for 24 h to 28 days, with group sizes typically between three and 15, and few studies reporting any bleeding or coagulation endpoint. Diagnostic applications are closer to patients because iron-oxide nanoparticles have already been given to humans, although not for imaging. We identified seven registered clinical studies of nanoparticle-related interventions in stroke; one perfluorocarbon nanodroplet emulsion completed a randomized dose-escalation trial in acute ischemic stroke, the EU Clinical Trials Register returned none, and none exists in hemorrhagic stroke. Nanoparticle platforms, therefore, remain investigational, and progress will depend less on new chemistry than on comorbid and large-animal models, realistic treatment windows, systematic reporting of bleeding risk and of interference with follow-up imaging, and reproducible manufacturing.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrierintracerebral hemorrhagenanoparticleneuroprotectionstroketheranosticstranslational nanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID42859492
PMCPMC13653147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.