Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859453›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2026

First-trimester non-invasive prediction of preterm birth using cell-free DNA fragmentomics.

My-Diem Nguyen Pham, Minh-Tam Thi Phan, Nhat-Thang Tran, Ta-Son Vo, Hong-Thinh Le, Thu-Ha Thi Nguyen, Quoc-Huy Vu Nguyen, Minh-Thi Thi Ha, Tam Minh Le, Diem-Tuyet Thi Hoang and 38 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors.

My-Diem Nguyen PhamMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Minh-Tam Thi PhanMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nhat-Thang TranUniversity Medical Center (Tran), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ta-Son VoVinmec Health Care System (Vo, Nguyen), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hong-Thinh LeCan Tho Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Le, Nguyen), Can Tho, Vietnam.
Thu-Ha Thi NguyenNational Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Nguyen, Dao), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quoc-Huy Vu NguyenHue University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Nguyen, Ha, Le), Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Minh-Thi Thi HaHue University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Nguyen, Ha, Le), Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Tam Minh LeHue University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Nguyen, Ha, Le), Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Diem-Tuyet Thi HoangHung Vuong Hospital (Hoang, Van Nguyen), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Khanh-Trang Nguyen HuynhPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine (Huynh), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nhan Viet NguyenVinmec Health Care System (Vo, Nguyen), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Chuong Canh NguyenHanoi Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (Nguyen), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thuong Chi BuiNhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital (Bui), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Xuan Thanh NguyenHue Central General Hospital (Nguyen, Le), Hue, Vietnam.
Sa Viet LeHue Central General Hospital (Nguyen, Le), Hue, Vietnam.
Vinh Dinh TranDanang Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital (Tran, Pham), Danang, Vietnam.
My-Nhi Ba NguyenTam Anh General Hospital (Nguyen), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thong Van NguyenHung Vuong Hospital (Hoang, Van Nguyen), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tuyet-Anh Thi NguyenHanh Phuc International Hospital (Nguyen), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ba Phuoc HoangVung Tau General Hospital (Hoang), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Trong Van NguyenBa Ria General Hospital (Van Nguyen), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thuy-Ai Thuy NguyenCan Tho Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Le, Nguyen), Can Tho, Vietnam.
Toa Tri NguyenThai Nguyen A Hospital (Nguyen, Dao, Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Thang Duc DuongObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics (Duong), Vietnam.
Cuong Huy PhamBac Ninh 2 Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (Pham), Bac Ninh, Vietnam.
Kim-Oanh Thi LuongNghe An Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital (Luong), Nghe An, Vietnam.
Cuong Ngoc DaoThai Nguyen A Hospital (Nguyen, Dao, Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Khanh Van HoangAndrology and Fertility Hospital of Hanoi (Van Hoang), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thu-Thanh Thi HuynhKhanh Hoa General Hospital (Huynh), Khanh Hoa, Vietnam.
Khuong Manh NguyenThai Nguyen A Hospital (Nguyen, Dao, Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Son-Tra Thi TranVietnam-Cuba Dong Hoi Friendship Hospital (Tran), Quang Binh, Vietnam.
Hoanh Trung TranThai Nguyen A Hospital (Nguyen, Dao, Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Son Canh NguyenThai Nguyen A Hospital (Nguyen, Dao, Nguyen, Tran, Nguyen), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Thuy Dinh TranDong Nai 2 Hospital (Tran), Dongnai, Vietnam.
Phương Thi Lan NguyenLong Khanh General Hospital (Nguyen), Dongnai, Vietnam.
Thanh Viet PhamMekong Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Pham), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Kong Chi PhamDanang Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital (Tran, Pham), Danang, Vietnam.
Minh Doan ThaiMy Duc Hospital (Thai), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thanh-Thuy Thi DoMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoa Thi DaoNational Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Nguyen, Dao), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Yen-Linh Thi VanMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Sang Hung TangMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoai-Nghia NguyenMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Minh-Duy PhanMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoa GiangMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Cuong Thach NguyenMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quang Thinh TracMedical Genetics Institute (Pham, Phan, Do, Van, Tang, Nguyen, Phan, Giang, Nguyen, Trac), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, yet accurate prediction in asymptomatic women during early gestation remains a critical unmet clinical need. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained through the same maternal blood collection used for routine first-trimester non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) represents an underutilized substrate for early PTB risk identification. Objective: To develop and validate a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomic classifier for the early prediction of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) using routine first-trimester non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) data. Study design: A case-control study was conducted within a multicenter Vietnamese cohort comprising 286 pregnancies, including 82 spontaneous PTB cases and 204 term controls. Maternal plasma cfDNA collected during routine first-trimester NIPT (median gestational age, 12 weeks) was sequenced to a depth of approximately 20 million reads per sample. Five fragmentomic feature categories including copy number alterations, end-motif composition, nucleosome distance, fragment length, and joint fragment-length × end-motif were evaluated for PTB prediction. Machine learning classifiers were developed in a training cohort (n=228, 65 PTB vs 163 TB) and tested in an internal held-out validation cohort (n=58, 17 PTB vs 41 TB). Results: Among the 5 fragmentomic feature classes evaluated, 4-mer end-motif (EM) profiles exhibited the most pronounced differences between PTB and term control samples. Consistent with these findings, the EM-based classifier demonstrated the highest discriminative performance in the internal validation cohort, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI, 0.912-1.000). At a specificity >90%, the model achieved a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 78%-100%). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that cfDNA EM signatures derived from routine first-trimester NIPT can accurately identify pregnancies at risk of spontaneous preterm birth, using only a routine maternal blood sample, supporting the potential to extend the clinical utility of existing prenatal screening infrastructure pending prospective validation at production sequencing depths.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAearly predictionfragmentomicsmachine learningNIPT preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID42859453
PMCPMC13652838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.