Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859452›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2026

Understanding how a national clinical audit is established, maintained and sustained using the Irish Hip Fracture Database as an exemplar: a realist evaluation protocol.

Louise Brent, Pamela Hickey, Mary Walsh, Fidelma Fitzpatrick, Niamh A Merriman, Elaine Byrne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise BrentDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-235X
Pamela HickeyNational Office of Clinical Audit, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
Mary WalshNational Office of Clinical Audit, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
Fidelma FitzpatrickDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3204-5962
Niamh A MerrimanDublin City University School of Nursing Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-7762
Elaine ByrneCentre for Positive Health Sciences, Royal College for Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7322-277X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing focus on clinical audit within the Irish Health System to drive quality improvement and standardise care, with many established and emerging clinical audits underway. Since the burden of data collection typically falls to busy clinical staff, understanding the impact of audit is especially crucial. However, the literature rarely explores how audits generate impact, for whom and in what context, despite the considerable effort invested in collecting this valuable data. This study will explore how a national clinical audit is established, maintained and sustained in order to maximise impact using the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) as an exemplar. The research will be conducted through a realist evaluation lens, which aims to determine what works, for whom, how and to what extent. Realist evaluation is a theory- based approach that uses mixed-methods to explore and answer the research question. Initially programme theories will be formulated through a review of the literature, qualitative interviews, and subsequently refined with an expert panel. The Initial Programme Theories (IPTs) will be refined through iterative rounds of consultation and context-mechanism-outcome configurations. This process will identify demi-regularities, which are semi-predictable patterns that occur often enough to be noticeable, but not universally or consistently across all contexts. These patterns will inform understanding of how the intervention (i.e. the audit) operates or impacts differently across varying contexts. Ultimately, this will inform the development of a middle-range theory to better understand developing and sustaining a clinical audit with meaningful impact. The resulting findings will have relevance and potentially inform and/or enhance the implementation and development of other audits. Ethical approval has been granted by the Research Ethics Committee in the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and at relevant healthcare conferences including patient and public focused conferences.

Indexed as

healthcareKeywords: clinical auditquality improvementrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42859452
PMCPMC13650314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.