ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Robotic Cholecystectomy Remains Safe and Effective After Regular Hours: A 3-Year Update.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite growing popularity in robotic-assisted surgery, access during evenings and weekends for nonelective operations may be restricted. A prior smaller comparison study in 2024 found no basis for safety concerns in managing acute cholecystitis in this setting. We sought to provide additional data to further evaluate whether restriction of robotic cholecystectomy during "after-hours" is justified. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 161 patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis according to 2018 Tokyo criteria by a single surgeon at multiple institutions between 2021 and 2026. Patients were grouped as after-hours cholecystectomy if the operation started at 5 pm or later, or anytime during the weekend (Saturday/Sunday). Preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome variables were tabulated and analyzed. Results: Sixty-five after-hours and 96 regular-hours robotic cholecystectomies were included. There were no significant differences in perioperative variables between the 2 cohorts in terms of body mass index, age, sex, cirrhotic status, ASA score, white blood cell count, nor neutrophil percentage. With the exception of alkaline phosphatase, there were no significant differences in liver function tests. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, complications, nor 30-day readmissions. No bile duct injuries or mortalities occurred in either cohort. Conclusion: In this 5-year retrospective comparison, robotic cholecystectomy performed during evenings and weekends was associated with similar perioperative outcomes compared with regular-hours cases within a single experienced surgeon's practice. These findings support the feasibility of after-hours robotic cholecystectomy in this setting and provide a basis for further multisurgeon investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.