ReviewMaedica2026
The Surgical Anatomy of Gastrocolic Trunk: a Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Its Significance in Right Colectomy.
Review in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The gastrocolic trunk of Henle is a clinically important venous confluence located near the inferior pancreatic border and the right side of the superior mesenteric vein. Its tributary anatomy is variable and may influence surgical dissection during right colectomy, right hemicolectomy, complete mesocolic excision (CME), central vascular ligation (CVL) and D3 lymph node dissection. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the anatomical, radiological, and surgical evidence on the prevalence, tributary composition, classification patterns, morphometric features, preoperative recognition and operative relevance of the gastrocolic trunk of Henle in right-sided colon surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect using terms related to the gastrocolic trunk of Henle and its variants. Eligible studies included original anatomical, radiological, and surgically relevant clinical investigations reporting extractable data on GTH/GCT presence, tributaries, drainage patterns, classification, morphometry, imaging recognition, or operative relevance. Random-effects proportion meta-analysis was performed when compatible numerator-denominator data were available. Evidence was stratified into live intraoperative right colectomy/right hemicolectomy studies, preoperative imaging studies, cadaveric studies, and general radiologic anatomy studies. Results: The search identified 188 records. After removal of seven duplicates, 181 records were screened, 21 full-text reports were assessed for eligibility and 15 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Eleven studies contributed to quantitative pooled analyses. In live intraoperative right colectomy/right hemicolectomy cohorts, the pooled prevalence of GTH/GCT was 0.9047, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.7557 to 0.9668 and substantial heterogeneity. In preoperative imaging studies, the pooled detection proportion was 0.8849, with a 95% CI from 0.8079 to 0.9336. Cadaveric studies showed a pooled prevalence of 0.9310, with a 95% CI from 0.8446 to 0.9710. Tributary-specific findings demonstrated substantial variation involving the right colic, superior right colic, middle colic, ileocolic and anterosuperior pancreaticoduodenal veins. Conclusion: The gastrocolic trunk of Henle is a frequent but anatomically variable venous structure with practical relevance to right-sided colon surgery. Its importance lies in its relationship to the superior mesenteric vein, infrapancreatic region and right-colon venous drainage during CME, CVL and D3 lymph node dissection. Current evidence supports careful preoperative and intraoperative assessment of this region, but does not prove that GTH/GCT identification alone improves oncological outcomes. Future studies should use standardized definitions, consistent denominators and prospective reporting of imaging accuracy, operative safety and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.