ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Obstetric and neonatal implications of ultrasonographically diagnosed marginal cord insertion: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMarginal cord insertion (MCI) is an anatomical variation hypothesized to cause suboptimal placentation, but its independent impact on perinatal outcomes remains controversial.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the independent impact of ultrasonographically diagnosed MCI on obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective case-control study conducted at a tertiary center between January 2022 and January 2025 screened 3,247 pregnancies. Thirty-six cases diagnosed with MCI were initially matched with 108 central cord insertion controls (1:3 ratio) for baseline comparisons. After excluding four MCI cases due to major fetal anomalies or demise, the final analysis included 32 MCI cases and 108 controls. Baseline characteristics, gestational comorbidities, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for maternal age and BMI.
resultsThe incidence of MCI was 1.1%. In univariate analysis, the MCI group had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery (28.1% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.015), lower median birth weight (3087.5 g vs. 3300 g; p = 0.038), and lower 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores (p = 0.016 and p = 0.015, respectively) compared to controls. In the multivariable model, MCI was associated with increased odds of preterm birth (aOR: 6.36; 95% CI: 1.73-23.41; p = 0.005). However, associations with low birth weight (aOR: 3.49; p = 0.331) and low Apgar scores did not maintain statistical significance in the adjusted model.
conclusionMCI is associated with increased odds of preterm birth in our cohort. While neonatal morbidity appears to be primarily mediated by shortened gestation, further large-scale studies are needed to determine whether standardized antenatal surveillance can improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.