ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Multivariate analysis of morphometric traits for chicken breed discrimination.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Morphometric traits provide valuable insights into poultry breed characterization, yet their predictive utility across developmental stages remains unexplored. This study aimed to categorise three poultry strains (PB1, PB2, and Punjab Brown) using morphometric data across growth phases, employing statistical and machine learning methodologies. One-way ANOVA, correlation matrices, and dimensionality reduction methods like Principal component analysis (PCA), Kernel PCA, and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were used to measure and analyse 29 morphometric traits. Logistic regression (LR) models classified strains on reduced-dimensional datasets. Significant (p < 0.05) differences among strains were observed in body weight, body length, and total length, while seven traits relating to shank length, wing length, and body girth (SL10, WL15, SL15, BG15, WL20, SL20, SL25) were non-significant. Strong intra-strain correlations (r > 0.85) were observed in girth and skeletal dimensions, whereas early expressed traits such as hatch weight (BW0) showed low correlations (r < 0.30) with other variables across different strains, indicating limited predictive value. PCA retained 85.6% of variance within the first five components, and LDA enabled distinct strain separation. Among classification pipelines, LDA + logistic regression achieved the highest performance (accuracy, precision, and recall = 1.00), followed by KPCA + LR and PCA + LR. Integrating morphometric profiling with supervised learning effectively differentiates poultry strains and enhances classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.