ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Growth and reproductive responses of goat bucks to range grazing and concentrate-based production systems.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of range grazing and three concentrate-based production systems on the growth, sexual behavior, scrotal circumference, and semen quality of breeding bucks. A total of 40 yearling bucks (10 bucks/treatment) were randomly allocated to range grazing (T1) and three different roughage-to-concentrate ratios: 60:40% (T2), 50:50% (T3), and 40:60% (T4) on a DM basis for a period of 90 days. All data were analyzed via ANOVA in SAS-JMP Pro 19. Bucks in T3 and T4 presented greater average daily gains (ADG) than those in T1 and T2 did, although T2 presented better gains than did T1. In T1 bucks, scrotal development, the number of mounts, the frequency of ejaculation, the courtship behavior score, and the testosterone concentration were lower, whereas the reaction time and refractory period were greater than those in T3 and T4. Bucks fed the T4 diet presented greater semen volume, followed by those fed T3 and T2, and the lowest semen volume was observed at T1. Strong positive correlations were observed between dry matter intake (DMI), scrotal circumference, and semen volume. ADG was also strongly correlated with semen volume (r = 0.81), motility (r = 0.78), and scrotal circumference (r = 0.82). The results of this study indicated that concentrate-fed bucks had better daily gain, scrotal development, and functional semen quality traits (semen volume, motility, and concentration) than did range grazing bucks, although the ADG, feed conversion efficiency, and mating frequency of the bucks fed the T3 and T4 diets were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.