ArticleGeroScience2026
Balance control is more affected in older than younger adults by repeated visual perturbations during walking.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory degradation with aging can impair balance control, partly by disrupting visual contributions to self-motion estimation. We investigated age-related differences in center of mass (CoM) trajectories controlling in the frontal plane during exposure to repeated visual perturbations in walking. We hypothesized that the older adults would show larger responses to visual perturbations and less adaptation to repeated visual perturbation exposure. We applied three visual perturbations to 14 healthy older (age = 75.0 ± 2.4) and 16 younger adults (age = 23.4 ± 3.9) walking on a treadmill: fixating a stationary target with the background moving to the right (MB), tracking a target moving rightward over a stationary background with head rotation (MT-HR), and tracking a moving target with eye movement only (MT-EM). CoM position deviations due to the visual perturbations were assessed. Over the whole trial, the older adults did not show larger CoM position variability than the younger during visual perturbation walking, which was contrary to our hypothesis. During visual perturbation epochs, both age groups deviated in the same direction except MB. In MB, the older adults deviated to an opposite direction after a few perturbation repetitions. Moreover, in MT-HR and MT-EM, the older adults deviated earlier than the younger adults and they deviated more in the MT-HR condition. This indicates that older adults exhibit reduced ability to accurately estimate self-motion through correction by other sensory modalities when exposed to visual perturbations. Over repeated perturbations, the older adults showed decreased CoM deviations in MT-EM, which suggests that they still maintain the capacity to downweight visual information after repeated exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.