Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859324›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026

Distribution of Losses Among Horse Race Bettors: An Analysis of Account-Based Player Tracking Data.

Kerem Buzcular, Ingeborg Rossow, Ståle Pallesen, Tony Leino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kerem BuzcularDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, N-5020, Norway. kerembuzcu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5766-8995
Ingeborg RossowDepartment of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-9367
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, N-5020, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-0840
Tony LeinoDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, N-5020, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-4153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research on gambling loss patterns has mainly relied on self-reported data, which has some inherent biases (e.g., low accuracy). While some studies are based on large samples of horse bettors, few have examined how losses are distributed among them. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine the concentration of losses among gamblers playing horse betting games. Norsk Rikstoto, the Norwegian horse betting monopoly, provided account-based gambling data for all customers who bet with them between 2021 and 2023, covering 13 horse betting formats. To describe the shape of the loss distribution for each format, we calculated the mean-to-median loss ratio, the Gini coefficient, and the shares of total losses attributable to the top 1%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of bettors. Across all 13 betting formats combined, the mean-to-median loss ratio was 7.06 (min: 4.88, max: 11.53) and the Gini coefficient was 0.81 (min: 0.77, max: 0.87). Overall, the top 1% of bettors accounted for almost one-quarter of total losses (24.7%), while the top 20% accounted for 86.0%. This imbalance was most pronounced for single-race games (top 1%: 26.2-39.5%; top 20%: 87.3-91.5%) compared with the multi-race V-games (top 1%: 19.9-23.9%; top 20%: 81.0-87.5%). In summary, losses in horse betting are heavily concentrated among a relatively small share of bettors. The degree of inequality differs across game types, suggesting that product characteristics may play a role in shaping who loses and by how much.

Indexed as

account datagambling lossesGini coefficienthorse race betting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.