ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Distribution of Losses Among Horse Race Bettors: An Analysis of Account-Based Player Tracking Data.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research on gambling loss patterns has mainly relied on self-reported data, which has some inherent biases (e.g., low accuracy). While some studies are based on large samples of horse bettors, few have examined how losses are distributed among them. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine the concentration of losses among gamblers playing horse betting games. Norsk Rikstoto, the Norwegian horse betting monopoly, provided account-based gambling data for all customers who bet with them between 2021 and 2023, covering 13 horse betting formats. To describe the shape of the loss distribution for each format, we calculated the mean-to-median loss ratio, the Gini coefficient, and the shares of total losses attributable to the top 1%, 5%, 10%, and 20% of bettors. Across all 13 betting formats combined, the mean-to-median loss ratio was 7.06 (min: 4.88, max: 11.53) and the Gini coefficient was 0.81 (min: 0.77, max: 0.87). Overall, the top 1% of bettors accounted for almost one-quarter of total losses (24.7%), while the top 20% accounted for 86.0%. This imbalance was most pronounced for single-race games (top 1%: 26.2-39.5%; top 20%: 87.3-91.5%) compared with the multi-race V-games (top 1%: 19.9-23.9%; top 20%: 81.0-87.5%). In summary, losses in horse betting are heavily concentrated among a relatively small share of bettors. The degree of inequality differs across game types, suggesting that product characteristics may play a role in shaping who loses and by how much.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.