Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859319›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Effects of dietary barley malt extract on growth performance, immune parameters, intestinal fermentation and gut microbiota in nursery piglets.

Laya Kannan Silva Alves, Flávio de Aguiar Coelho, Rafaella Fernandes Carnevale, Matheus Saliba Monteiro, Janaina Cristina da Silva Maciel de Souza, Eduarda Buck Bernardes Guimarães, Cecília Archangelo Ferreira de Melo, Roberta Yukari Hoshino, Erick Marlon Pereira, Fernanda Mariane Dos Santos and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Laya Kannan Silva AlvesLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Flávio de Aguiar CoelhoLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Rafaella Fernandes CarnevaleLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Matheus Saliba MonteiroLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Janaina Cristina da Silva Maciel de SouzaLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Eduarda Buck Bernardes GuimarãesLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Cecília Archangelo Ferreira de MeloLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Roberta Yukari HoshinoLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Erick Marlon PereiraLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda Mariane Dos SantosLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Nadia de Almeida Ciriaco GomesLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Ana Lígia Braga MezzinaLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Caroline VelosoLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
José Alfonso Echavarria MartínezLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Marques CamporaLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Ana Clara Rodrigues de OliveiraLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil.
Allan Paul SchinckelAnimal Sciences Research and Education Center, Animal Sciences Faculty, College of Agriculture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2053, USA.
Monique Danielle Pairis-GarciaGlobal Production Animal Welfare Laboratory, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Cesar Augusto Pospissil GarbossaLaboratory of Swine Research, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 13635- 900, SP, Brazil. cgarbossa@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7184

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303750/2021-9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2024/10939-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/ 05582-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/07008-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/11275-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/12374-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/13232-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2025/28305-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2026/01092-6Liotécnica Tecnologia em Alimentos Liotécnica Tecnologia em Alimentos
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of graded dietary barley malt extract (BME) supplementation on growth performance, fecal consistency, immune parameters, antioxidant status, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations, and gut microbiota composition in nursery piglets. A total of 144 weaned piglets (24 days of age; 7.02 ± 1.08 kg) were allocated to four treatments containing 0, 0.33, 0.66, or 0.99% BME for 42 days. Performance variables were assessed at the pen level, and laboratory analyses were performed using one representative piglet per selected pen. No consistent dose-response effects were observed for body weight, average daily gain, feed intake, or diarrhea incidence throughout the nursery period. A linear increase in feed conversion ratio was detected during the pre-starter II phase (P = 0.023), but no cumulative performance effects were observed over the overall nursery period. Antioxidant enzyme activities, leukocyte populations, and fecal SCFA concentrations were unaffected by BME inclusion (P > 0.05). Microbial alpha diversity indices were unchanged; however, specific microbial taxa, including Veillonellaceae, Mitsuokella, and Mogibacterium, differed among inclusion levels. Overall, dietary BME up to 0.99% did not improve growth performance, immune parameters, antioxidant status, or intestinal fermentation in nursery piglets, although modest shifts in microbial composition were observed.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHordeumPlant ExtractsSus scrofaAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFemaleFermentationIntestinesMaleFatty Acids, VolatilePlant ExtractsBarley by-productsDiarrheaGut healthShort-chain fatty acidsSwine nutritionWeaning

Identifiers

PMID42859319
PMCPMC13653829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.