ReviewTropical animal health and production2026
Feed additives as frontline tools in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural animals.
Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feed additives are among the most promising nutritional strategies for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from livestock. Numerous studies have investigated their potential to mitigate GHG emissions from ruminants and pseudo-ruminants using both in vitro and in vivo approaches. These studies have examined a wide range of additives, including phytogenic compounds, microbial additives, seaweeds and microalgae, enzymes, dietary lipids, synthetic inhibitors, agricultural by-products, and nano-encapsulated bioactive compounds. Feed additives have been investigated in various forms, including plant extracts, microbial combinations, nano-encapsulated formulations, and purified bioactive compounds, with several demonstrating promising potential for reducing methane and other GHG emissions while maintaining desirable fermentation characteristics. However, the translation of promising findings into practical livestock production requires further validation through well-designed in vivo studies, particularly to establish effective doses, consistency of responses, and potential interactions with animal species and diets. This editorial highlights recent advances in the use of feed additives for GHG mitigation and discusses key priorities for their practical application. It also recognises the receipt of the 2026 TWAS-UNESCO Award in Agriculture, Nutrition and Food Systems Sciences by Prof. A.Z.M. Salem for his contributions to improving animal production and health and mitigating GHG emissions through innovative feed additives and alternative food resources for cleaner agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.