ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Implementing genetic counselling supervision in southwestern Europe: the MAG-SUDOE programme.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in medical genetics and the expansion of personalized medicine have made genetic counselling essential. The increasing workload of genetics professionals highlights the need for strategies that strengthen the services resilience. Genetic counselling supervision (GCS) is a structured routine of reflective practice that promotes safe practice, prevents burnout, and prepares professionals to adapt to new challenges, while supporting continuous improvement. However, GCS practices vary widely between countries: in many, these are not even known, while in others they are mandatory. This inequality results from the asymmetrical development of the genetic counselling profession globally. Spain, France, and Portugal have specialized training in this area, but only France has formally recognised the profession. Consequently, there is a small and geographically dispersed number of professionals, mostly without GCS access.
objectivesHere we report how the MAG-SUDOE programme proposes a pioneering solution to jointly implement GCS and to strengthen the resilience of genetics services in southwestern Europe through activities linked to: 1) transferring experience from a Portuguese pilot action assessing the feasibility of a GCS programme; 2) jointly developing a transnational GCS intervention with genetics healthcare professionals of the three countries; and 3) designing a common strategy for its further implementation in the territory.
methodsA transnational collaborative project have been implemented. A joint intervention was designed and will served as empirical base for the definition of national strategies for the implementation of GCS in the three countries.
resultsFostering institutional alignment between genetic counselling professional bodies and lead consortia members, this project establishes a foundation to promote GCS on a transnational scale and generate evidence to guide health policy decisions for a more equitable and high-quality health system. DISCUSSION/
conclusionThe programme is currently being implemented across the three countries through supervision groups with high engagement among participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.