ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
The impact of ventilation mode on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction in a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSepsis commonly causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and immune hyperactivation may be a causal link. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is common in ARDS, and VILI may potentiate organ dysfunction in severe sepsis. We used a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated ARDS to test whether ventilation strategy could impact systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.
methodsFemale Yorkshire pigs (6-8 months) underwent ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of the small bowel and fecal clot implantation or sham laparotomy. The abdominal sepsis animals were ventilated with a volume-controlled (VC) mode using the ARDS-Net low tidal volume (LVt) method to set and adjust the mode, and applied at two time points. Late LVt, was applied once PaO
resultsSham animals showed no evidence of sepsis or ARDS, whereas all experimental animals developed septic shock, requiring fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Both LVt groups developed ARDS as measured by PaO
conclusionIn a porcine model of abdominal septic shock we found that animals ventilated with a higher mean airway pressure strategy (APRV) had decreased plasma proteomic signatures of inflammation compared to those ventilated with a conventional low tidal volume strategy. Our findings are hypothesis generating and not directly translatable to the clinical setting. Future studies should focus on further elucidating a link between VILI and its effect on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.