ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Primary care and idiopathic scoliosis: an evaluation of family physicians' roles.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) can progress silently during growth. Early primary care detection prevents curve progression and reduces treatment burden. This study aimed to assess the role of family physicians in screening, diagnosis, counseling, and follow-up of adolescents with IS, and to evaluate primary care attributes using the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS). This cross-sectional study included 150 patients with IS followed at a university orthopedics clinic in Türkiye. Data were collected via structured telephone interviews using a custom 13-item questionnaire and the validated Turkish PCAS. Descriptive statistics and bivariate parametric and non-parametric tests were used for the analysis (p < 0.05). Only 11% of participants were first diagnosed by family physicians, whereas 68% were diagnosed by orthopedic surgeons. Primary care involvement was low: scoliosis-focused examination (15%), counseling (15%), referral (15%), and exercise recommendations (19%) were infrequent. PCAS scores were highest for longitudinal continuity (79 ± 20) and trust (63 ± 12), and lowest for preventive services and counseling (44 ± 35). Late-onset scoliosis was associated with significantly higher scores in comprehensive knowledge, physical care, personal approach, accessibility, and communication (p < 0.05).
conclusionMost patients with IS are diagnosed outside primary care, highlighting a substantial underutilization of opportunistic screening and early clinical evaluation in primary care settings. Standardizing scoliosis screening during routine adolescent well-visits, enhancing primary care awareness and guidance, and strengthening referral pathways are crucial for enabling earlier detection, modifying disease progression, and mitigating long-term clinical burdens. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Early detection of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) through opportunistic screening prevents curve progression, avoids invasive surgeries, and reduces long-term healthcare burdens.. WHAT IS NEW: • Only 11% of IS patients are diagnosed in primary care, revealing critical gaps in screening, posture examination, and counseling despite high longitudinal trust in family physicians..
Indexed as
Identifiers
42859262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.