Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859196›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2026

Purpureocillium lilacinum and Pochonia chlamydosporia as biocontrol agents: a comparative review of efficacy, ecology, and integrated application.

R Jabeen Taj, B Anita, N Seenivasan, K Devrajan, S Harish, V A Sathiyamurthy

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R Jabeen TajDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
B AnitaDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India. anitabellie@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-1087
N SeenivasanDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
K DevrajanDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
S HarishDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
V A SathiyamurthyOffice of Dean Horticulture, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause annual global crop losses, driving the urgent demand for sustainable alternatives to synthetic nematicides to control them. Among biological control agents, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Pochonia chlamydosporia have emerged as the most promising egg-parasitic fungi. However, their comparative biology and deployment contexts remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on their taxonomy, ecology, molecular genomics, parasitism mechanisms, biocontrol efficacy and commercial formulations. Both fungi parasitize eggs of economically destructive genera, Meloidogyne, Heterodera, and Globodera, but differ fundamentally in their ecological niches, infection mechanisms, and molecular arsenals. P. lilacinum exhibits broader ecological versatility, infecting multiple nematode life stages and producing nematicidal leucinostatins, whereas P. chlamydosporia specializes in egg parasitism, establishes stable rhizosphere endophytism, and primes systemic plant defenses via pochonin metabolites. Comparative genomics revealed shared serine proteases and chitinolytic enzyme arsenals for eggshell penetration, alongside species-specific virulence determinants shaped by positive selection and gene duplication. Field and greenhouse studies have consistently demonstrated substantial suppression of nematode egg populations, although efficacy remains strongly dependent on the fungal isolate and environmental conditions. Integration with other biocontrol agents, organic amendments, and reduced-dose nematicides consistently outperformed single-agent applications. Emerging nanoemulsion and blastospore-based formulations show promise in overcoming the persistent challenges of UV sensitivity and shelf life instability. Rather than redundant alternatives, these fungi offer complementary biological solutions, providing a mechanistic rationale for combined deployment within crop-specific, integrated pest management frameworks.

Indexed as

Biological Control AgentsHypocrealesNematodaPest Control, BiologicalPlant DiseasesAnimalsTylenchoideaBiological Control AgentsBiological controlEgg-parasitic fungiIntegrated pest management (IPM)Mode of actionPochonia chlamydosporiaPurpureocillium lilacinum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.