ArticleBMC cancer2026
Establishment and genomic validation of novel patient-derived xenograft models for drug discovery in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients develop clinical resistance to approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The development of effective treatment strategies for refractory GIST requires identification of novel targets for investigational agents and well-characterized preclinical models, like patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, to evaluate them. While GIST PDX models have been shown to mirror patient tumors in cell morphology and driver mutation status, studies across tumor types indicate that PDX models may undergo limited genomic changes during engraftment and passaging. We performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of six KIT-mutant GIST PDX models derived from TKI-refractory patients. Pairwise comparison of copy number variation (CNV) profiles indicated strong correlation between PDX and matched primary tumors. Four models exhibited changes in the number of CNV events relative to the primary tumors, suggesting clonal selection and tumor heterogeneity during engraftment and passaging. Analysis of cancer-associated gene aberrations showed stability of primary KIT driver mutations, with minor fluctuations in the allelic frequencies of acquired mutations, suggesting initial heterogeneity of GIST tumors and potential enrichment of sub-clonal populations through passaging. To functionally assess model fidelity in vivo, three PDX models were treated with the approved second-line TKI sunitinib. The models exhibited differential responses that could not be fully explained by driver mutation status alone, highlighting the need for further investigation in larger cohorts.These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genomic characterization of PDX models prior to their use in preclinical studies, supporting more accurate interpretation of experimental results and preserving their value as research tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.