Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859169›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Diagnostic interpretation of CFH expression in pan-cancer analyses: the importance of factor H-like 1 isoform resolution.

Simon J Clark

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon J ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. simon.clark@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent pan-cancer analyses have identified Complement Factor H (CFH) expression as an immune-related and prognostic biomarker. However, interpretation of CFH transcriptional data requires consideration of isoform specificity. The CFH gene encodes both full-length factor H (FH) and the biologically active splice isoform factor H-like 1 (FHL-1), which differ in structure and tissue localization. Common transcriptional and knockdown approaches do not distinguish between these isoforms, potentially introducing biological heterogeneity into diagnostic and prognostic assessments. Isoform-resolved analyses may therefore enhance the specificity and clinical utility of CFH-based biomarkers in oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorComplement Factor HNeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansProtein IsoformsBiomarkers, TumorCFH protein, humanComplement Factor HProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID42859169
PMCPMC13654215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.