ReviewDermatology practical & conceptual2026
Childhood Rosacea: Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Insights into an Underestimated Pediatric Condition.
Review in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRosacea is a very frequent skin disease; however, its prevalence in children is underestimated, and there are not enough data on this dermatosis in the pediatric population.
objectiveThis study aimed to give comprehensive insight into childhood rosacea (CR), pointing out predisposing factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic clues, and therapy of this subgroup of the disease spectrum.
methodsThis is a narrative review of the existing data on rosacea in children.
resultsChildren affected by rosacea often present with recurrent erythema of the convex areas of the face as an early sign of the disease, mostly occurring after cold/heat/sun exposure or triggered by crying/playing/exercise. Phymatous lesions do not occur in children, and Morbihan disease has been very rarely reported. On the other hand, special rosacea subtypes, such as periorificial dermatitis, granulomatous rosacea, or idiopathic facial aseptic granuloma, are observed more often in children. The diagnosis is usually made based on the clinical picture; however, dermoscopy, and in some cases other imaging techniques, may aid the diagnosis. It is still a matter of debate whether a child affected by rosacea will become an adult with rosacea over time. The holistic approach to therapy of rosacea in children should include in particular the avoidance of triggering factors, proper skin care, and finally, adequate pharmacological treatment. Although procedural therapeutic options are frequently used in adults, their use in children should be tailored to the patient's age and discussed with the parents or caregivers.
conclusionRosacea may also occur in children. Therapeutic options do not significantly differ from those in adults; however, they must be adjusted to the child's age.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.