Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42858221›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Robotic systems in cranial surgery: a systematic review of accuracy, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.

Alison E Burgess, Bailey D Lupo, Luke P Landry, Ben V Peco, Nadia V Haik, Zack Karzoun, Norris C Talbot, James R Bridges, Michael Folse, Ryan R Diaz and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alison E BurgessSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. abu001@lsuhs.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9258-4419
Bailey D LupoSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Luke P LandrySchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Ben V PecoSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Nadia V HaikSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Zack KarzounSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Norris C TalbotSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
James R BridgesSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Michael FolseSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Ryan R DiazDepartment of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Jamie TomsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery is becoming more prevalent in neurosurgery. Many studies have classified the advantages and disadvantages, particularly in spinal robotic surgeries. However, the use of robotics in cranial procedures has been limited to individual studies without large-scale review of the different modalities. This study is a comprehensive systematic review of the major robotics utilized in cranial neurosurgical procedures and their respective outcomes. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted over PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for articles published between January 2000 to February 2025. EndNote and Rayyan were utilized to organize the 1,409 identified studies and conduct a blinded multiphase process for including and excluding studies. Originally, studies were intended to be run as a meta-analysis to compare robotic modalities, but the existing data was too heterogeneous to statistically contrast outcomes. Overall, 51 studies were included, with six robots being discussed in more than one study. The use of robotics in cranial neurosurgery stretches mostly across functional neurosurgery, with different applications in brain tumor biopsies and resection, hemorrhage drainage, and endoscopic surgeries. Cranial neurosurgical procedures primarily apply robotics in the world of functional neurosurgery. Outside of this subspecialty, robotic-assisted cranial surgery remains sparse in the literature. As technology evolves, more use cases may be realized.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansTreatment OutcomeCranialNeurosurgeryRobotRobot-assisted

Identifiers

PMID42858221
PMCPMC13653822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.