ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
LEF1 expression in melanocytic tumors cannot accurately predict CTNNB1 mutational status acting as a potential pitfall in bi-phenotypic lesions.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost melanocytic lesions develop along a genetic continuum progressing from a nevus to melanoma. Melanocytomas represent an intermediate category of tumors that lie within that spectrum harboring additional genetic alterations that may affect their phenotype. WHO currently recognizes three melanocytoma categories: Pigmented Epithelioid Melanocytomas (PEMs), BAP1-inactivated Melanocytomas (BIMs) and WNT-activated deep penetrating/plexiform melanocytomas (naevus) (WNT-activated DPMNs). Among them, WNT-activated DPMNs represent an underrecognized entity often misinterpreted as other biphenotypic pigmented lesions or melanomas. Therefore, LEF1 has been proposed as a marker of increased utility in the diagnosis of WNT-activated DPMNs. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe assessed LEF1 expression in a series of 61 melanocytic tumors including 10 Spitz nevi, 16 blue nevi, 9 common nevi, 1 combined nevus, 9 melanomas (various subtypes), 12 WNT-activated DPMNs, 2 WNT-activated melanomas and 2 PEMs. Beta-catenin was evaluated in all combined lesions and in one atypical cellular blue nevus (n = 23). Furthermore, CTNNB1 mutational analysis was performed in 49 cases.
resultsLEF1 nuclear positivity was detected in 43/61 cases, i.e. 6/10 (60%) Spitz nevi, 5/16 (31%) BN (4/5) bi-phasic BN, 0/5 dendritic BN and 1/6 cellular BN), 9/9 (100%) common nevi, 0/1 combined nevus, 9/9 (100%) melanomas, 12/12 (100%) WNT-activated DPMNs, 2/2 WNT-activated melanomas and 0/2 PEMs. Subsequent examination for CTNNB1 molecular status displayed mutations only in WNT-activated lesions. Nuclear beta-catenin was detected in 11/12 WNT-activated DPMNs and in both WNT-activated melanomas; the remaining 10 lesions assessed, including the atypical cellular blue nevus, demonstrated physiological membranous expression only.
conclusionLEF1 expression should be interpreted cautiously in pigmented or combined melanocytic lesions. Its diagnostic value is enhanced when assessed alongside beta-catenin or supported by CTNNB1 mutation analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42858195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.