ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Waiting for elective orthopaedic surgery: a qualitative scoping review of the patient experience.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublic health waiting lists for elective or planned orthopaedic surgery are increasing to the point where demand far exceeds our ability to treat. This is largely due to ageing populations, rising obesity and the continued impact of delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While waiting, patients suffer debilitating physical pain, functional limitation, social isolation, and associated mental health impacts while some are unable to work. This qualitative scoping review explored and mapped the experiences of patients of waiting for elective or planned orthopaedic surgery.
methodsThis review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A comprehensive database search was conducted to identify English-language articles from 2009 until June 2025. Data extraction was informed by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results were thematically analysed and presented using the Quality Health Outcomes Model.
resultsThe initial search identified 4713 articles, of which 21 manuscripts met inclusion criteria. The 21 articles comprised 17 primary qualitative research studies and four review articles published within the designated time period (2009-2025). Two key themes were identified: (i) patients waiting for elective orthopaedic surgery need psychosocial support and (ii) system-level, multifactorial communication issues with the waiting list leave patients feeling lost between primary and specialist care. These themes suggest that the challenges faced due to lengthy elective surgery waiting lists are not simply a capacity issue, but also a challenge of coordinated, patient- centred care.
conclusionWaiting for surgery is consistently described by patients as a source of anxiety and distress. With waiting list times for elective surgery increasing, the experience can be improved in part with adequate communication from healthcare providers. A re-focus on what matters most to the patient and their family is required in order to deliver adequate patient-centred care while patients wait for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.