Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42858119›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2026

Comparator Event Rates, Baseline Activity, and Operational Selection Pressure in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Analysis.

Steffen Pfeuffer, Lars Masanneck, Marc Pawlitzki, Hans-Peter Hartung

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steffen PfeufferDepartment of Neurology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-4845
Lars MasanneckDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-1415
Marc PawlitzkiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-2277
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0614-6989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReference-arm annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in relapsing multiple sclerosis trials have declined. We examined whether baseline disease activity and the treatment environment during recruitment changed alongside this trend.

methodsWe analyzed 15 treated-reference arms from nine Phase 3 programs. ARR was related to recruitment era, prior-year relapse activity, MRI markers, and an Operational Selection Pressure Index (OSPI) combining recruitment geography with time since ocrelizumab approval. Associations were descriptive; disability outcomes were audited separately.

resultsReference-arm ARR declined from 0.370 in TEMSO and 0.320 in TOWER to 0.109-0.140 in BTK inhibitor-era programs (ρ = -0.906; 95% CI, -0.985 to -0.279; n = 15). Prior-year relapse activity correlated with ARR (ρ = 0.739; 95% CI, 0.158 to 0.928; n = 13) and declined over time (ρ = -0.725; 95% CI, -0.965 to -0.157; n = 13). MRI findings were inconsistent. OSPI clustered at 0-7.3 in six programs and 65.2-80.5 in BTK inhibitor-era programs and correlated inversely with ARR (ρ = -0.892; 95% CI, -1.000 to -0.569; n = 9). The association persisted across sensitivities but was negligible after adjustment for recruitment midpoint (partial ρ = -0.020). Disability trends depended on reporting metric and effective follow-up.

conclusionsLower baseline relapse activity accompanied declining event yield. OSPI made a treatment-ecosystem transition measurable but could not be separated from calendar era or establish mechanism. Trials require conservative event assumptions, harmonized reporting, and validation using screening and country- or period-specific outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPatient SelectionHumansclinical trialsdrug approvalmultiple sclerosispatient selectionPhase IIIrelapsing–remittingtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42858119
PMCPMC13653506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.