Trial reportAnnals of medicine2026
Testing peripheral and central therapies for provoked vestibulodynia: results from the UPDATe trial.
Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03844412 (Vestibulodynia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vestibulodynia: Understanding Pathophysiology and Determining Appropriate Treatments
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVestibulodynia (VBD) is a common chronic pelvic pain condition with heterogeneous clinical presentation, including subtypes distinguished by the presence (VBD-central; VBD-c) or absence (VBD-peripheral; VBD-p) of comorbid pain conditions. Despite frequent prescribing of topical therapies such as lidocaine/estradiol and centrally-acting agents such as tricyclic antidepressants, high-quality evidence for efficacy, alone or in combination, remains limited. This study evaluated effects of peripheral, central, and combined pharmacologic treatments for two VBD subtypes and whether treatment response varied by subtype. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03844412) at two academic medical centers. Women aged 18-50 with clinician-confirmed VBD were randomized to one of four treatment arms: 1) topical 5% lidocaine + 0.05% estradiol vaginal cream and placebo pill, 2) oral nortriptyline pill and placebo cream, 3) combined active pill and cream, or 4) double placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was provoked vulvovaginal pain by a standardized tampon test (0-10 numeric rating scale).
resultsOf 209 participants, 69 had VBD-p and 140 had VBD-c. Tampon test pain decreased modestly across all arms, with the greatest proportion of decrease in the combined nortriptyline plus lidocaine/estradiol group, but there was no difference between subtypes. In the primary model, baseline pain strongly predicted Week 16 pain (β = 0.68,
conclusionsIn this trial, neither peripheral nor centrally targeted pharmacotherapies demonstrated superiority over placebo in reducing provoked vulvovaginal pain at 16 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.