Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857891›Full record

ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2026

Rome V Criteria for Adults: What's New and Why?

Amanda Krause, Lin Chang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda KrauseVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-0417
Lin ChangVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-2967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rome V criteria, published in 2026, represent the culmination of a 7-year effort to refine and improve the diagnostic framework for disorders of gut-brain interaction. The revision incorporates the latest consensus guidelines and emerging research while moving away from stigmatizing language and toward a more personalized, patient-centered approach. It also more clearly distinguishes between clinical and research criteria, ensuring patients are diagnosed accurately and treated appropriately, and reinforces the roles of the multidimensional clinical profile and the biopsychosocial model in guiding personalized care. This paper reviews these changes and the rationale behind them.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal DiseasesAdultBrainHumansPractice Guidelines as Topicbiopsychosocial modelbrain‐gut axisdiagnostic criteriadisorders of gut‐brain interactionfunctional gastrointestinal disordersRome criteria

Identifiers

PMID42857891
PMCPMC13653318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.