ArticleVisual cognition2025
Feature-temporal predictions dynamically modulate performance, feature-based attentional capture, and motor response activity during visual search.
Article in Visual cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent work has shown that temporal predictions linked to spatial expectations can guide visual search in dynamic environments, but less is known about feature-based temporal predictions. Here, we investigated whether behaviour is guided towards feature-temporally predictable targets in crowded, dynamic displays under spatial uncertainty. Participants searched for two distinct targets (non-overlapping colour-shape combinations) in a free-viewing visual-search task. During learning trials, each target appeared transiently at a predictable time (early or late); in testing, some appeared unpredictably. We assessed whether feature-temporal predictability improved target identification, modulated attentional guidance, and tuned motor preparation. Results showed that, early during trials, participants were more efficient at identifying temporally predicted targets, with electromyography revealing enhanced muscle activity aligned with expected target timing. Distractors sharing features with either target captured gaze most often when that target was expected, indicating temporally tuned, feature-based attentional guidance. These findings highlight the flexibility of temporal expectations in guiding behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.