Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857835›Full record

ArticleHeart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association2026

A Diagnostic Dilemma: Urosepsis Mimicking ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Mohamed Atta, Amr Ashour, Fadi Khazaal, Abdul Rahman Arabi, Mhd Baraa Habib

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed AttaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Amr AshourDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Fadi KhazaalDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abdul Rahman ArabiDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mhd Baraa HabibDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. Healthcare systems worldwide have established national guidelines to facilitate the timely identification and transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to centers capable of performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Typically, ST-segment elevation (STE) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) is indicative of STEMI, prompting early intervention. However, rare cases of STE have been documented in the setting of sepsis or septic shock, with subsequent coronary angiography or imaging revealing normal coronary arteries. There is limited information regarding the exact mechanisms responsible for STE in the context of sepsis. We report the case of a 79-year-old Indian female who presented with epigastric pain and vomiting. Her initial ECG showed STE in leads I, aVL, and V2, accompanied by markedly elevated cardiac biomarkers. In accordance with the national STEMI network protocol, she received prehospital dual antiplatelet therapy and intravenous heparin before hospital arrival and was transferred directly for primary PCI. She was initially managed as a case of ACS; however, coronary angiography demonstrated normal coronary arteries. Further evaluation led to the diagnosis of septic shock secondary to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing

Indexed as

Electrocardiogramsepsisseptic shockST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID42857835
PMCPMC13652566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.