Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857820›Full record

ReviewPain reports2026

Assessment and characterization of back pain and biopsychosocial influences in lower limb amputation: scoping review.

Kevin Arribart, Maximilian O'Malley, Gerson Cipriano, Marlon L Wong, Robert S Gailey, Ignacio A Gaunaurd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin ArribartDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-6366
Maximilian O'MalleyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1665-9618
Gerson CiprianoPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-7003
Marlon L WongDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-2092
Robert S GaileyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-2511
Ignacio A GaunaurdDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-0684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back pain affects over half of individuals with lower limb amputation, yet research findings on associated factors remain fragmented. In view of the evolution of pain science in the general population, this fragmentation likely stems from significant variability in the identification, characterization, and classification of pain, as well as inconsistent assessment of associated biopsychosocial factors. This scoping review aims to examine how back pain is currently identified, assessed, classified, and characterized in people with lower-limb amputation, to determine the gaps and inconsistencies that could impede standardization and evidence synthesis. Six electronic databases were searched for studies involving major unilateral acquired lower limb amputation. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data using standardized forms in Covidence. Synthesis focused on identification, classification, reporting of back pain-related biopsychosocial variables, and assessment strategies. Sixty-seven studies were included, predominantly cross-sectional (69%). Although pain intensity was frequently assessed, methods were binary (yes/no), and the use of mechanistic classification and biopsychosocial factors was sparse. Measurement strategies were highly heterogeneous, with standardized frameworks used in only 4 studies. This scoping review reveals a profound discrepancy between contemporary pain science approaches and current pain practice methodologies for the lower limb amputation population. Significant diagnostic gaps persist because of inconsistent classification of pain mechanisms and a void in reporting biopsychosocial variables. Prioritizing standardized frameworks and a population-specific core outcome set is essential to bridge the translational gap. These advancements will improve research quality and facilitate more targeted, evidence-based clinical care for this complex population.

Indexed as

AmputationBack painClassificationMeasurementsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42857820
PMCPMC13652451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.