ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Repurposing the Pedicled Posterior Arm Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The posterior arm flap (PAF) is a fasciocutaneous flap that has been used in axillary reconstruction; however, there is a paucity of literature to support its use in postmastectomy reconstruction in patients who no longer have more traditional autologous breast reconstruction options available. Herein, we present an alternative approach for autologous breast reconstruction using a modified pedicled PAF. Our patient presented to the clinic requesting implant removal and autologous reconstruction due to persistent pain and discomfort. Her history of a right-sided transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, extended axillary scar violating latissimus dorsi muscle, and liposuction to bilateral thighs precluded use of the deep inferior epigastric perforator, latissimus dorsi, or profunda artery perforator flaps. She was noted to have excess tissue in the upper extremities and, thus, the decision was made to perform a pedicled PAF for reconstruction. An adipocutaneous flap was raised from the bilateral posteromedial arms based on perforators from the brachial artery. The implant and capsule were excised using the previous mastectomy incisions. The PAF was tunneled through the axilla and inset to fill the breast mound. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on postoperative day three. At her 1-year follow-up, the patient remains pleased with her results and has had no postoperative complications. The PAF is a viable option in patients who desire small-to-moderate sized breasts and in those unable to undergo prolonged free flap reconstruction due to comorbidities or inadequate donor sites.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.