Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857692›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2026

Visual Search Task Reveals Categorical Representation of Topological Spatial Relations Between Objects.

Jintao Song, Li Zheng, Zhentao Zuo, Tiangang Zhou, Yan Zhuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jintao SongSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-6779
Li ZhengState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-2123
Zhentao ZuoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-3884
Tiangang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1005-5106
Yan ZhuoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geometry provides a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding the spatial relations between objects. Topological properties are regarded as among the most fundamental invariants in geometry. To investigate how the visual system represents topological structures (e.g., inside/outside relations, connectivity), the current study employed the visual search task and visual stimulus sets designed by varying the distance between two objects equally. Results showed that task performance improved when the difference in object relations crossed category boundaries defined by topological properties. The study excluded the influence of potential confounding factors, such as the perceived depth caused by occlusion (experiments 1a and 1b). Furthermore, when the relevant inside/outside topological category boundary was removed, performance varied systematically with metric distance (experiment 1c). The categorical advantage was further observed across different modes of connectivity (experiments 2a, 2b, and 2c). These findings provided evidence for the categorical representation of topological spatial relations in visual perception.

Indexed as

geometryspatial relationstopological structurevisual search task

Identifiers

PMID42857692
PMCPMC13651773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.