ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Simulation-Based Training in Emergency Skills: A Narrative Review Across Diverse Learner Populations.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency skills are critical competencies for managing sudden medical events, reducing disability, and lowering mortality rates. Traditional training methods are often limited by deficiencies in knowledge retention, skill acquisition, and clinical application. Despite growing evidence on simulation-based training, a comprehensive synthesis across diverse learner populations and training modalities remains lacking. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive narrative synthesis of current evidence regarding the implementation of simulation training in emergency skills education. Main Body: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2010-2026) using keywords related to simulation training, emergency skills, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, virtual reality, and medical education. The review is organized around four thematic areas: (1) theoretical foundations and core design elements of simulation training, including feedback, repetition, and scenario fidelity; (2) simulation training for practicing professionals, encompassing layered training models and crisis resource management; (3) simulation training for diverse learner populations, including school-age learners, health profession students, and community participants; and (4) emerging technologies including virtual reality, augmented reality, and wearable devices, which offer immersive and scalable alternatives despite distinct limitations. These modalities demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge acquisition, skill proficiency, and long-term retention, alongside self-reported gains in learner confidence, a subjective outcome that should be distinguished from objectively assessed competence. However, methodological limitations such as small sample sizes, brief follow-up periods, and heterogeneous outcome measures were pervasive. Conclusions: Simulation training enhances emergency skills across diverse populations, but long-term retention and cost-effectiveness require further investigation. Future directions include multicenter randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up, standardized outcome measures, and rigorous cost-effectiveness analyses to strengthen the evidence base for simulation-based emergency skills education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.