Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857635›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Exploring the links between neuropsychological health and stress biomarkers among nurses: a rapid review.

Stacy Pryor, Ardis Hanson, Ryan Pace, Usha Menon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacy PryorUniversity of South Florida College of Nursing, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Ardis HansonAssistant Director- Research and Education. University of South Florida Health Libraries, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Ryan PaceAssistant Professor and Assistant Director- Biobehavioral Laboratory. University of South Florida College of Nursing, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Usha MenonDean and Distinguished University Health Professor, Senior Associate Vice President, USF Health. University of South Florida College of Nursing and Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consequences of workplace stress on the global nursing workforce are staggering. Nurses report poor mental health, including depressive symptoms, suicidality, and anxiety, along with less-than-optimal working conditions. The psychological nature of stress is a functional response to changing circumstances (e.g., workload, patient-nurse ratios, and shift work). Short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic) responses can manifest emotionally, behaviorally, perceptually, or physiologically. Yet the relationships among the different manifestations of stress, whether neuropsychologically, perceptually, or physiologically, are unclear in the nursing workforce populations. Objective: To conduct a rapid review investigating the use of subjective and objective measures of stress among nurses. Methods: The protocol followed the 2024 Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Guidance. The protocol was registered with Results: Our analysis identified a total of 46 studies from North and South America (n=16), Europe (n=16), Asia (n=12), and Africa (n=2). Stress studies examined acute, historical, or persistent high chronic stress levels. These studies focused primarily on biomarkers from the autonomic nervous system and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (e.g., cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, heart rate variability, and C-reactive protein). Eighty-seven psychological instruments were used across 46 studies to measure stress and its neuropsychological symptoms (e.g., Perceived Stress Scale or Visual Analog Scale). Furthermore, 80 instruments were validated, and seven were researcher-generated. Heterogeneous methodologies were used, including biomarker analysis, evaluations of neuropsychological functioning, and assessments of perceived stress, which contributed to variability in conceptualizing stress as an inherent attribute, a symptomatic expression, or a manifestation of external stressors. Limitations: Many of the studies had small sample sizes, were underpowered, lacked statistical rigor, and/or used voluntary/convenience recruitment. Adapted instruments were not always validated. Conclusion: Measuring neuropsychological health using biomarkers and validated psychometric instruments will allow researchers to better assess the complex responses nurses have to workplace stressors and provide unique insights into the workplace stress nurses face daily.

Indexed as

BiomarkersNursesOccupational stressPhysiological adaptationsPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID42857635
PMCPMC13651659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.