ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Inflammation across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease: healthcare physician perceptions and practices in six European countries.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is growing evidence that inflammation is associated with development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The extent of physician awareness of this evidence, and its impact on clinical care, is unknown. Therefore, our aim was to investigate and characterize the perceptions and clinical practices of HCPs with respect to inflammation when treating patients with atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) + chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-4 or heart failure (HF). Methods: This was a qualitative research study involving semi-structured, 1-hour Zoom interviews (including open- and close-ended questions) conducted from February-April 2024. Eligible HCPs were cardiologists, nephrologists, or general practitioners with ≥5 and ≤30 years of post-graduate clinical experience; working in France, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland; who had managed ≥10 patients with ASCVD + CKD or HF in the previous 3 months. Results: Most of the 62 HCPs included in the study (84%) acknowledged the theoretical importance of inflammation in progression of ASCVD + CKD or HF. However, only 17 (27% of the 62) routinely tested for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) due to limited awareness of the clinical implications of inflammation in CVD and the lack of consistently proven interventions. If hsCRP is assessed, HCPs cannot alter their patient management in response to the findings due to a lack of treatment options. Conclusion: This study presents the perceptions and practices of a sample of HCPs. Because of limited evidence for the efficacy of interventions and the incomplete understanding of the role of inflammation in CVD, inflammation remains a neglected treatment target in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.