ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Upfront or deferred radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy for inoperable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a target trial emulation in China.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a curative treatment modality for inoperable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, for patients with ESCC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), the appropriate sequence of RT relative to CIT remains unclear. Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study adopted a target trial emulation framework to compare survival outcomes between groups. Time zero was defined as the start date of the initial treatment. Simulated randomisation, treatment initiation, and follow-up commenced concurrently at time zero. Patients with inoperable ESCC (including locally advanced disease and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis) who received first-line CIT between June 2018 and December 2023 were enrolled from eight large-scale hospitals across China. Stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimise baseline imbalances. Prespecified grace periods were introduced to classify participants into two groups: Upfront-RT and Deferred-RT. Immortal time bias was addressed using the clone-censor-weight method. Effect sizes were estimated using the absolute rate difference (RD) in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the cumulative risk ratio (RR) for death or disease progression. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR2500111871). Findings: A total of 1242 participants (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 1004 [80.8%] male) were included in the study. With a grace period of 42 days in the primary analysis, the Deferred-RT group had improved median OS (44.1 months vs 33.4 months; adjusted HR, 0.699 [95% CI, 0.580-0.843]), and longer median PFS (21.1 months vs 16.0 months; adjusted HR, 0.760 [95% CI, 0.645-0.895]) compared with the Upfront-RT group. After correcting baseline imbalances and immortal time bias, patients in the Upfront-RT group exhibited a reduction in the 3-year OS rate (41.9% vs 57.5%; RD, -15.6%; 95% CI, -26.3% to -5.6%) and PFS rate (22.4% vs 33.8%; RD, -11.4%; 95% CI, -19.2% to -4.2%), along with an increase in 3-year cumulative risk ratios for death (RR, 1.368; 95% CI, 1.108-1.637) and disease progression (RR, 1.172; 95% CI, 1.056-1.295), compared with those in the Deferred-RT group. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses corroborated these findings. The median RT dose was 60.0 (IQR, 50.4-60.0) Gy in the Upfront-RT group and 50.4 (IQR, 0-60.0) Gy in the Deferred-RT group. The incidence of severe treatment-related oesophageal fistula was 9.0% (36 cases) and 4.8% (40 cases), respectively. Interpretation: In this retrospective study with target trial emulation, first-line CIT plus deferred RT was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with upfront RT plus first-line CIT for patients with inoperable ESCC. However, given the inherent limitations of observational data and the lack of adjustment for time-varying covariates, the observed associations should be interpreted with caution as exploratory findings. Future prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these results. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui Provincial Health Science and Technology Project, Health Research Project of Anhui Province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.