ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A comparative analysis of traditional classroom and future classroom lab in mathematics education: exploring pre-service teachers' emotions and self-efficacy beliefs.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the lack of empirical research regarding how Traditional Classroom (TC) versus innovative Future Classroom Lab (FCL) learning environment influence students' emotional responses and self-efficacy beliefs in mathematics education. A quasi-experimental design using intact classroom groups was employed to accommodate scheduling constraints and ensure equitable access to the newly pedagogical approaches. Therefore, the sample was selected by the occasional sampling method by convenience. A total of 105 Pre-Service Teachers (PSTs) participated in the study. The instrument was administered online before and after the intervention. The questionnaire comprised 23 items: 14 assessing achievement emotions and 9 assessing self-efficacy beliefs in mathematics learning. The instruments demonstrated robust internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficients exceeded 0.70. The ANOVA indicated significant effects on emotions and self-efficacy beliefs, with larger effects when the course intervention was implemented in the FCL setting. When gender and educational background were assessed as covariates, no significant effects of these variables were observed. Post-intervention correlations between emotions and self-efficacy beliefs were higher in the FCL (76.2%) than in the TC (23.8%). The main objective of this study was to examine how transitioning from a TC setting to a FCL impacts PSTs' emotions and self-efficacy beliefs. Finally, the results point at that the integration of FCL in this mathematics proposal significantly reduces the emotional aversion and low self-efficacy in mathematics that PSTs typically exhibit toward this subject. Therefore, this study can positively potentially impact PSTs' learning and their future teaching practices as a direct consequence of utilizing the FCL in mathematics education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.