Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857591›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: the movement towards response-adapted therapy.

Kenneth Jc Lim, Holly Pertile, Andrew Spencer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth Jc LimThe Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Holly PertileDepartment of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Andrew SpencerThe Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, minimal residual disease (MRD) testing has emerged as a powerful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma. Multiple meta-analyses have demonstrated that achieving MRD negativity is associated with significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), leading to its acceptance as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials to support accelerated drug approval. Looking forward, MRD status is poised to be incorporated into treatment decision-making; to guide escalation and de-escalation of therapy with the aims of improved progression free survival with limited treatment toxicity. In this review article, we provide an overview of the current modalities available for MRD testing, including bone marrow, peripheral blood, and imaging-based techniques. We examine the prognostic significance of MRD status, with a focus on the impact of sustained MRD negativity, outcomes with MRD resurgence, and the depth of MRD negativity on progression free survival. Finally, we discuss the rapidly evolving landscape of MRD-adapted clinical trials and how these studies are informing the development of response-adapted treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualHumansPrognosisTreatment Outcomemass spectometryMRD - measurable residual diseasemyelomanext generating sequencingnext generation flow cytometry (NGF)response adapted therapyrisk adapted management

Identifiers

PMID42857591
PMCPMC13650939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.