ArticleCureus2026
Comparative Study of the Tell-Show-Do Technique With and Without a Dental Simulation Game to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental anxiety and pain in pediatric patients remain significant barriers to effective treatment delivery. The Tell-Show-Do (TSD) technique is a widely accepted non-pharmacological behavior management strategy; however, its efficacy may be augmented by interactive digital interventions such as dental simulation games. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the TSD technique with and without a dental simulation game in reducing pain and anxiety among pediatric dental patients.
methodsThis parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolled 68 children aged 4-10 years requiring dental treatment (pulp therapy or extraction). Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group (n = 34) received the TSD technique alone, while the intervention group (n = 34) received the TSD technique supplemented with a dental simulation game (BabyBus). Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) and the Modified Toddler-Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale (MTPPPS). Anxiety was evaluated through pulse rate - at baseline, during, and after treatment/procedure. Data were analyzed using the chi-squared test and independent-samples t-test, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
resultsThe intervention group had a lower mean WBFPRS score than the control group (3.12 ± 1.92 versus 4.47 ± 2.31), with a mean difference of 1.35 points (95% CI: 0.32-2.38; p = 0.011). MTPPPS scores did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (3.98 ± 1.73 versus 3.86 ± 1.40; mean difference: -0.12, 95% CI: -0.88 to 0.64; p = 0.757). Baseline pulse rates were comparable between the groups (81.00 ± 5.85 versus 79.67 ± 6.20 beats/min; p = 0.539). During treatment, the intervention group had a lower mean pulse rate than the control group (84.33 ± 7.10 versus 97.00 ± 8.40 beats/min; p < 0.001). No significant between-group difference was observed after treatment (73.67 ± 5.40 versus 74.67 ± 5.90 beats/min; p = 0.501).
conclusionThe addition of a dental simulation game to the conventional TSD technique significantly reduced pain and anxiety in pediatric dental patients aged 6-10 years. Simulation-based pre-exposure may serve as a valuable adjunct to standard behavior management, particularly for technologically adept children of Generation Alpha.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.