ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2026
Temporal outcomes and biomarkers of rituximab treatment response in pemphigus: Validation of a historical control dataset.
Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rituximab and corticosteroids remain the only clinically approved therapies for pemphigus vulgaris, although novel therapeutics are entering clinical development. A historical control dataset previously described clinical and serologic outcomes after rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris, but whether these data are representative of other patient cohorts is currently unclear. A contemporary pemphigus vulgaris cohort (n = 97) was compared with the historical cohort (n = 107) to assess clinical outcomes as well as desmoglein 3 ELISA predictive performance for achieving complete remission off oral immunosuppressive therapy. A total of 41.2% of patients achieved complete remission off oral immunosuppressive therapy after the first rituximab cycle, with a maximum complete remission off oral immunosuppressive therapy prevalence of 52.8% at month 36, including multiple rituximab cycles. Despite differences in baseline characteristics and treatments (particularly rituximab dosing), the temporal patterns of remission, relapse, and retreatment were broadly similar across cohorts. A desmoglein 3 ELISA index value ≤ 130 RU/ml and > 90.7% titer reduction between months 3 and 9 demonstrated 90% specificity and 88% sensitivity for future achievement of complete remission off oral immunosuppressive therapy, with negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively, suggesting that low and/or rapid large drops in autoantibody titers after rituximab may predict an absence of disease activity. These data describe the temporal outcomes of rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris and validate the historical control dataset for future comparative effectiveness research and biomarker-driven management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.