SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Time-stratified prognostic factors for poor renal outcomes in childhood-onset lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Excess glutamine rewires endothelial cell metabolism.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify prognostic factors independently associated with poor renal outcomes in childhood-onset lupus nephritis (cLN) based on multivariable analyses. Methods: Seven databases were searched up until October 2025. Adjusted odds ratio (OR), hazard ratios (HR), and pooled proportions of renal outcomes were estimated using random-effects models. Outcome-specific analyses were performed when sufficient data were available, and sensitivity analyses excluding studies at high risk of bias were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. Methodological quality was evaluated using quality in prognostic studies tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: 47 studies were included, with 23 assessed as having a high risk of bias. The included studies explored prognostic factors across follow-up periods of 1 year (n=11), 1-2 years (n=9), and >2 years (n=27). Within 1 year, 27 (OR) prognostic factors were identified. Within 1-2 years, 25 (OR) and 6 (HR) prognostic factors were identified respectively. Beyond 2 years, 26 (OR) and 55 (HR) were identified respectively. Frequently evaluated factors associated with poor renal outcomes included age, dialysis, eGFR <60, hypertension, kidney flare, male sex, and renal non-remission within 6 or 12 months. Nephrotic-range proteinuria and increased serum creatinine were associated with poor renal outcomes in the primary analysis but showed limited robustness after excluding studies at high risk of bias. Higher eGFR and hemoglobin levels showed inverse associations with poor renal outcomes. Outcome-specific analyses suggested that male sex and increased serum creatinine were mainly associated with kidney-specific outcomes comprising CKD and/or ESRD, whereas renal non-remission at 6 and 12 months was associated with composite outcomes. Except for renal non-remission (1 year: 23.00%; >2 years: 22.43%), the reported cumulative proportions of other outcomes were higher in studies with longer follow-up durations (CKD: 4.19% to 11.46%; ESRD: 3.10% to 8.58%; mortality: 2.69% to 8.71%). Conclusion: Identified prognostic factors provide a reference for stratified management of cLN. Differences in prognostic associations across studies categorized by follow-up duration and higher cumulative proportions of adverse outcomes in studies with longer follow-up highlight the need for longitudinal, dynamic risk assessment strategies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251169446, identifier CRD420251169446.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.