Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857550›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Construction and validation of a 28-day mortality prediction model for refeeding syndrome in critically ill patients.

Jiajia Pan, Xuanle Wu, Nina Wang, Guangfa Wei, Yuyan Zhang, Qining Zheng, Min Zhang, Weili Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiajia Pan *Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xuanle Wu *Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Nina WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Guangfa WeiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yuyan ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qining ZhengDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Min ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Weili LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a common and serious metabolic reaction during nutritional support in critically ill patients, associated with substantially increased mortality risk and poor prognosis. Existing studies mainly focus on predicting its occurrence, while predictive models for 28-day mortality risk remain lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model to support short-term prognostic assessment in clinical practice. Methods: Data for critically ill patients with RFS were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, 2008-2019) as the internal cohort. A total of 8,705 patients were randomly assigned to training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Thirty-eight candidate variables were initially included, and feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Three machine learning models were subsequently constructed, and the optimal model was validated using two independent datasets. Model interpretability was enhanced using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival between the high- and low-risk, and nomograms were constructed to facilitate clinical application. Results: Nine variables were ultimately selected to construct the logistic regression model. The model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance and generalizability, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.821, 0.809, and 0.731 in the internal test set, external validation set I (MIMIC-III), and external validation set II (the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University), respectively. SHAP analysis identified partial pressure of oxygen, mean blood glucose level, and age as the key prognostic factors and further revealed nonlinear effects among the variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed that the model significantly distinguished between the high- and low-risk groups across all cohorts (all Conclusion: The interpretable machine learning model developed in this study effectively predicts the 28-day mortality risk of RFS in critically ill patients, provides an objective reference for individualized clinical decision-making, and may help improve patient prognosis.

Indexed as

28-day mortalitycritical illnessmachine learningprediction modelrefeeding syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42857550
PMCPMC13650927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.