Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857532›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Feeding the estrobolome with sweet prebiotics?

Lorenzo Agoni, Canio Martinelli, Salvatore Cortellino, Antonio Giordano, Francesco De Seta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorenzo AgoniUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Canio MartinelliSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Salvatore CortellinoClinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale (SSM), Naples, Italy.
Antonio GiordanoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Francesco De SetaSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sweeteners are widely consumed, yet their effects on the gut microbiota remain incompletely characterized, while their potential influence on the estrobolome has received little direct investigation. Although many sweeteners are absorbed in the small intestine, a variable fraction reaches the colon, where it interacts with the gut microbiota. Some sweeteners may also meet the definition of a prebiotic when they are selectively utilized by host microorganisms and such utilization confers a demonstrated health benefit. Because the estrobolome encompasses microbial genes encoding estrogen-metabolizing enzymes, including β-glucuronidases and sulfatases, sweetener-induced changes in gut microbial composition or function could plausibly influence enterohepatic estrogen metabolism and systemic estrogen availability. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the effects of different sweeteners on the gut microbiota and examines their potential implications for the estrobolome. We summarize the consensus definition of prebiotics, the classification, metabolism, and colonic availability of major sweeteners, and review the biological basis of the estrobolome, with particular emphasis on microbial estrogen metabolism. Results: Experimental and human studies indicate that individual sweeteners can modify gut microbial composition and metabolic activity, but the direction and magnitude of these effects vary substantially according to the compound, dose, study model, and host context. However, direct studies evaluating the impact of sweeteners on estrobolome function are lacking, and potential effects currently remain inferential, based largely on reported changes in microbial taxa known or presumed to harbor genes encoding estrogen-metabolizing enzymes rather than on direct measurements of gene expression or enzymatic activity. Conclusion: Current evidence provides a biological basis for considering sweeteners as potential modulators of the estrobolome, although evidence directly linking individual sweeteners to changes in estrobolome function remains lacking. Well-designed multi-omic clinical studies integrating dietary exposure, gut microbiota composition, estrobolome function, estrogen metabolism, and clinically relevant outcomes are needed to establish the physiological and clinical relevance of this relationship and determine whether it can ultimately inform personalized nutritional strategies.

Indexed as

estrobolomeestrogenestrogen recirculationgut microbiomegut microbiotasweetenerswomen’s healthβ-glucuronidases

Identifiers

PMID42857532
PMCPMC13650910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.