Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857497›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Plan Metrics: A Principal Component Analysis Using the Mean Absolute Dose Deviation.

Olena Gorobets, Meymey San, Linda Mrissa, Sopheary Yoeun, Zineb Dahbi, Minh Dung Nguyen, Steve Heymann, Nam P Nguyen, Jeffrey M Ryckman, Vincent Vinh-Hung and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Olena GorobetsMaxillofacial Surgery, Cancer Tech Care Association, Perpignan, FRA.
Meymey SanRadiotherapy, Khmer Soviet Friendship Hospital, Phnom Penh, KHM.
Linda MrissaRadiotherapy, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, FRA.
Sopheary YoeunRadiotherapy, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, FRA.
Zineb DahbiRadiotherapy, International University Hospital Cheikh Khalifa, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Minh Dung NguyenOrthopedics and Sport Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City Sports Medicine Association, Ho Chi Minh City, VNM.
Steve HeymannRadiotherapy, Strasbourg Oncologie Libérale, Strasbourg, FRA.
Nam P NguyenRadiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, D.C., USA.
Jeffrey M RyckmanRadiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Camden Clark Medical Center, Parkersburg, USA.
Vincent Vinh-HungRadiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin, Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, FRA.
Parvez ShaikhRadiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Radiotherapy for breast cancer must deliver a sufficient dose to the targets while limiting the dose to the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast. Treatment plans are evaluated on many dose-volume metrics at once, and the balance between target coverage and organ sparing depends on the patient's setup and on the radiotherapy technique. We investigate the relationships among doses to targets, organs, and patient and treatment factors, and examine whether principal component analysis (PCA) can display these relationships in a small factorial planning dataset. Methods PCA was applied to the data from a quasi-experimental two-level factorial treatment planning study of breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy. The quasi-experiment assessed all combinations of five variables in eight patients: tumor laterality (left vs. right), surgery (mastectomy vs. breast-conserving), target volume (with vs. without lymph nodes), patient's setup position (supine vs. prone) (each patient underwent simulation in the two positions), and radiation delivery (conventional radiotherapy vs. tomotherapy) (both plans were computed in each setup position), which resulted in 32 distinct combinations of the variables. Results PCA showed that tumor left laterality and prone setup were associated with higher heart and contralateral breast doses; nodal irradiation and conventional radiotherapy were associated with higher lung doses, whereas post-mastectomy radiation contributed to high doses to both heart and lung. Tomotherapy was associated with reduced lung doses, better target coverage, slightly reduced heart doses, and increased contralateral breast doses. Conclusion PCA on a factorial design identified correlations between treatment factors and dosimetric outcomes with a minimal number of patients, which might be important in exploratory research, reducing the initial burden of accruing patients.

Indexed as

dose volume histogramfactorial designmean absolute dose deviationprincipal component analysisstatisticstreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42857497
PMCPMC13650669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.