ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Physical Rehabilitation for Postpartum Perineal Morbidity After Episiotomy and Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postpartum perineal trauma commonly causes pain and delayed maternal recovery, yet randomized evidence supporting rehabilitation interventions remains fragmented. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal pain, wound healing, and oedema following episiotomy or childbirth-related perineal trauma. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP were searched from inception to April 7, 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating rehabilitation modalities were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed where appropriate, and methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included, seven of which contributed to quantitative synthesis. TENS significantly reduced short-term postpartum perineal pain compared with control (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.83 to -0.55). LLLT showed no significant benefit (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.19), while therapeutic ultrasound demonstrated no significant reduction in persistent pain. Narrative evidence indicated favorable effects of cooling interventions on oedema, immediate pain relief, and maternal satisfaction. Two studies were judged at low risk of bias, five had some concerns, and two were at high risk of bias. Conclusions: This review provides the first comparative synthesis of randomized evidence evaluating physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal morbidity. The strongest evidence currently supports TENS for short-term pain relief, whereas cooling interventions appear beneficial for local symptom management. Larger, rigorously designed randomized trials are required to establish evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for postpartum perineal recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.