ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Occult gram-negative bacterial colonization of explanted alloplastic implants incidentally detected during revision rhinoplasty: a microbiologically confirmed case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative infection following rhinoplasty is uncommon but can have serious consequences, particularly after revision procedures. Latent bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on implanted materials may contribute to delayed or subclinical infection, yet microbiologically confirmed colonization of implants in fully asymptomatic patients is rarely documented, and Gram-negative organisms are seldom reported in this setting. Case presentation: A 35-year-old woman underwent revision rhinoplasty for a persistent nasal deformity after ten prior procedures involving alloplastic materials and autologous cartilage. She had no clinical signs of infection and had normal laboratory findings. Previously implanted expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and residual cartilage grafts were explanted, and intraoperative nasal fluid from the implant pocket was cultured, yielding Discussion: Viable bacteria may persist on implanted materials without clinical manifestations, consistent with biofilm formation. As no clinical, laboratory, or intraoperative signs of infection were present, the finding is best characterized as occult (latent) colonization rather than active infection and may be overlooked during revision rhinoplasty. Conclusion: Latent bacterial colonization of previously implanted materials in revision rhinoplasty may be under-recognized. Routine microbiological evaluation of explanted materials may facilitate early detection and guide postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.