ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Late Penile Urethral Involvement of Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Cystectomy: Diagnostic Challenge in Distinguishing Urethral Recurrence From Metastatic Disease.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile involvement of urothelial carcinoma is a rare clinical entity typically arising from primary pelvic tumours and is usually associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis. However, distinguishing between true penile metastasis and late urethral recurrence is challenging, particularly in patients with urethral preservation after radical cystectomy (RC). We report the case of a 77-year-old male with a history of high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma (pT2a N0) with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), treated with RC and uretero-ileal urinary diversion with urethral preservation. Ten years after surgery, the patient presented with a painful mass at the base of the penis accompanied by solid urethral discharge. Biopsy of the urethral content confirmed high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (G3) with invasion of the lamina propria. Multimodal imaging studies demonstrated a solid tumour involving the proximal third of the penile urethra with extension into the corpus spongiosum and tunica albuginea, alongside a suspicious left inguinal lymph node. The patient underwent radical penectomy and left laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma of the penile urethra, invading the corpus spongiosum and tunica albuginea (pT2 N0), with free surgical margins. Immunohistochemical profiling was not performed due to limited archival material, preventing definitive distinction between urethral recurrence and metastatic disease. No adjuvant systemic therapy was administered. At 2 years of follow-up, the patient remains disease-free on surveillance imaging. This case highlights the unusual late presentation of urothelial carcinoma involving the penis and underscores the diagnostic challenge in distinguishing urethral recurrence from true metastatic disease in the absence of molecular data. Long-term surveillance, including thorough physical examination, is essential even many years after initial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.