Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857447›Full record

ArticleCase reports in surgery2026

Late Penile Urethral Involvement of Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Cystectomy: Diagnostic Challenge in Distinguishing Urethral Recurrence From Metastatic Disease.

Vanessa Talavera Cobo, Mario Daniel Tapia Tapia, Andrés Calva López, Carmina Alejandra Muñoz Bastidas, Luis Labairu Huerta, Daniel Sánchez Zalabardo, José Enrique Robles García, Bernardino Miñana López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vanessa Talavera CoboUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2425-9795
Mario Daniel Tapia TapiaUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9040-3828
Andrés Calva LópezUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2503-9368
Carmina Alejandra Muñoz BastidasUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra St. Marquesado de Santa Marta 1 Madrid 28027 Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1175-5706
Luis Labairu HuertaUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-4203
Daniel Sánchez ZalabardoUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1803-580X
José Enrique Robles GarcíaUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra Avenue Pío XII, 36 Pamplona 31008 Navarra Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-641X
Bernardino Miñana LópezUrology Department Clínica Universidad de Navarra St. Marquesado de Santa Marta 1 Madrid 28027 Spain cun.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-5650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile involvement of urothelial carcinoma is a rare clinical entity typically arising from primary pelvic tumours and is usually associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis. However, distinguishing between true penile metastasis and late urethral recurrence is challenging, particularly in patients with urethral preservation after radical cystectomy (RC). We report the case of a 77-year-old male with a history of high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma (pT2a N0) with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), treated with RC and uretero-ileal urinary diversion with urethral preservation. Ten years after surgery, the patient presented with a painful mass at the base of the penis accompanied by solid urethral discharge. Biopsy of the urethral content confirmed high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (G3) with invasion of the lamina propria. Multimodal imaging studies demonstrated a solid tumour involving the proximal third of the penile urethra with extension into the corpus spongiosum and tunica albuginea, alongside a suspicious left inguinal lymph node. The patient underwent radical penectomy and left laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma of the penile urethra, invading the corpus spongiosum and tunica albuginea (pT2 N0), with free surgical margins. Immunohistochemical profiling was not performed due to limited archival material, preventing definitive distinction between urethral recurrence and metastatic disease. No adjuvant systemic therapy was administered. At 2 years of follow-up, the patient remains disease-free on surveillance imaging. This case highlights the unusual late presentation of urothelial carcinoma involving the penis and underscores the diagnostic challenge in distinguishing urethral recurrence from true metastatic disease in the absence of molecular data. Long-term surveillance, including thorough physical examination, is essential even many years after initial treatment.

Indexed as

late recurrencemetastasispenectomyperineal masstunica albugineaurethral recurrenceurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID42857447
PMCPMC13650596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.