ArticlePain reports2026
Intrinsic circadian organization of the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Circadian rhythms coordinate daily fluctuations in physiology and behavior, yet their organization within primary sensory pathways remains poorly defined. Although somatosensory responsiveness varies across the day-night cycle, it is unclear whether peripheral sensory circuits possess molecular mechanisms for temporal regulation. Objectives: To determine whether the spinal-peripheral sensory axis harbors intrinsic circadian clocks and to define the molecular scope and functional organization of circadian regulation in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs). Methods: We used real-time bioluminescence imaging to assess circadian oscillations of the core clock protein PER2 in the spinal dorsal horn and DRGs. To characterize molecular regulation, we performed RNA sequencing across a 52-hour circadian time course in DRGs. Results: We demonstrate that the spinal dorsal horn and DRGs harbor robust, tissue-autonomous circadian clocks, with sustained PER2 oscillations. Circadian analysis identified 626 rhythmic genes (3.6% of expressed genes) in DRGs, with nonuniform phase distributions forming discrete temporal clusters. Functional annotation revealed phase-specific enrichment of processes including transport, neuronal structure, and proteostasis, suggesting coordinated temporal deployment of distinct molecular programs rather than uniform oscillations. Cross-referencing with neuropathic pain-associated genes revealed limited overlap; however, overlapping genes aligned to specific baseline phase windows enriched for regenerative annotations. Potassium channel-related signaling components implicated in neuropathic pain also showed baseline circadian modulation. Conclusion: These findings establish the spinal dorsal horn and DRGs as intrinsically circadian tissues and reveal a temporally structured molecular landscape in DRG, providing a framework for understanding how peripheral sensory processing, plasticity, and homeostatic regulation are coordinated across the day-night cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.