Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42857327›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2026

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of the Sweating Function of the Human Earlobe for Heat Stress Monitoring.

Chikage Nagano, Kentaro Kado, Kisaki Maeda, Keiichi Tajima, Kimiyo Mori, Seichi Horie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chikage NaganoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Kentaro KadoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Kisaki MaedaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Keiichi TajimaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Kimiyo MoriDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Seichi HorieDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated thermoregulatory sweating at the earlobe under heat exposure as an initial step toward exploring its potential as a technically interesting candidate site for skin temperature monitoring in occupational heat stress assessment. Methods: Two experiments were conducted in healthy male participants. Sweat rates on the medial and lateral earlobe and forearm were quantitatively measured using ventilated capsule perspiration meters at 25, 30, and 35 °C ambient temperatures with 50% relative humidity. Qualitative sweating was assessed using Minor's iodine-starch test at 40°C ambient temperature and 50% relative humidity. Results: Earlobe sweat rates were consistently and significantly lower than forearm values, with minimal temperature-related variation. No iodine-starch reaction was observed on the earlobe, whereas sweating was detected on the auricle and face. Conclusion: The earlobe appeared to exhibit negligible thermoregulatory sweating under the tested conditions. Given the low likelihood of sweating-related interference, the earlobe may warrant further investigation as a technically interesting candidate site for future validation studies of skin temperature monitoring in occupational heat stress assessment.

Indexed as

Body temperature regulationEarHeat strokeSkin temperatureSweating

Identifiers

PMID42857327
PMCPMC13650352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.